#OCZ REVODRIVE 400 NVME SSD ALAUNCH PRO#
The RD400's energy usage is again worst overall with a significant gap between the Samsung 950 Pro and the RD400, and the 950 Pro already used more energy than most SATA drives.
#OCZ REVODRIVE 400 NVME SSD ALAUNCH FULL#
This time it's the 512GB and 1TB models showing a relatively large impact from the test being run on a full drive. Latency outliers above 10ms are clearly more common with the RD400 than the other PCIe 3 drives, but still less than half as frequent as on any SATA drive. OCZ readies RevoDrive 400: M.2 SSD with NVMe support Anton Shilov AugSSD Drives OCZ Storage Solutions, a supplier of solid-state drives controlled by Toshiba Corp., is working on a new. In this case, the RD400 is much closer to the Samsung drives when fresh, but about halfway between Samsung and Intel for filled-drive performance.Īverage service times again show that the differences between PCIe 3 drives are small compared to the gulf between them and SATA drives. Details of the Light test can be found here.Īs with the Heavy test, overall performance on the Light test shows the RD400 being slower than the Samsung PCIe 3 drives but faster than the Intel 750.
This test can be seen as the sum of all the little delays in daily usage, but with the idle times trimmed to 25ms it takes less than half an hour to run. We put in three SATA 3.0 drives a 2.5-inch 250GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO, a 3.5-inch 1TB 7,200RPM Seagate Barracuda HDD and a 2.5-inch 1TB Samsung SSD 850 Pro and a single PCIe drive, a 480GB OCZ RevoDrive 350 SSD that plugs straight into the workstation’s motherboard, just like a GPU.
It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so this is a test more of application launch times and file load times. Our Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall.
0 kommentar(er)
